exterior shots @Thomas Sattler 6 e1648757081233
exterior shots @Thomas Sattler 5 1 e1648800169260

PAX Magazine 2008

01 / 02

Sie sind hier: Home > Archive "PAX Stift Admont" > PAX Magazine 2008

Archive of the foundation's magazine "PAX" - 2008 issue

Discover the most important events and developments relating to Admont Abbey in our digital magazine archive.

At the times of the service

Career at Admont Abbey

 

Start your career with us and let's break new ground together. Apply now!

 

Careers

Impressum Datenschutzerklärung

Datenschutz

Wir, Stift Admont (Firmensitz: Österreich), würden gerne mit externen Diensten personenbezogene Daten verarbeiten. Diese ist für die Nutzung der Website nicht notwendig, ermöglicht uns aber eine noch engere Interaktion mit Ihnen. Falls gewünscht, treffen Sie bitte eine Auswahl:

Google Analytics

Google LLC, USA

Purpose: Error analysis, statistical evaluation of our website

Processing operations: collection of connection data, data from your web browser and data about the accessed content; execution of analysis software and storage of data on your end device, anonymisation of the data collected; analysis of the anonymous data in the form of statistics

Retention period: data on your end device, up to two years.

Joint data controller: Google LLC, AmphitheatreParkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

Legal basis for data processing: voluntary consent that can be withdrawn at any time

Consequences of not providing consent: no direct effect on the functioning of the website; however, limited possibilities for further development and error analysis

Legal basis for the transfer of data to the USA: the legal basis for the transfer of data to the USA is your consent in accordance with Art. 49 (1) (a) in conjunction with Art. 6 (1) (a) GDPR. The US does not have a level of data protection in line with EU standards. In particular, US intelligence agencies can access your data without you being informed of this, and without you being able to take legal action against it. For this reason, the CJEU, in a judgment, has declared the previous adequacy decision invalid.